Editorial methodology
How I review cars
This page explains how I approach car reviews, first drives, static previews and consumer advice, so readers and search systems can understand the basis for each verdict.
How cars are sourced
Reviews may be based on manufacturer press loans, launch events, first drives, extended loans, static previews or clearly labelled research using official information.
Independence
The aim is to give a useful, honest editorial view. If content is sponsored, paid for, or based on a specific commercial arrangement, that should be made clear in the article.
Driving context
Where relevant, reviews can record the exact test type, location, roads driven, duration, approximate mileage, weather, wheel size and the version tested.
Official versus observed data
Manufacturer figures such as WLTP range, boot space, dimensions and charging speed are treated separately from observed efficiency, tested range and first-hand driving impressions.
Scores and verdicts
Scores are optional and should only be used where there is enough experience to support a confident verdict. The quick verdict, pros and cons explain the reasoning.
Competitors
Rivals are selected editorially based on price, size, positioning, powertrain and real-world buying context rather than being generated automatically.
Corrections and updates
Articles can show both a published date and an updated date. The updated date should reflect a meaningful editorial change, not a routine site deployment.